Clinical comparative study on treatment of refractory obstetric and gynecological hemorrhage
治疗难治性妇产科大出血的临床对比研究

摘要

目的 对难治性妇产科大出血的治疗方式进行分析。方法 研究将本院收治的34例子宫动脉栓塞术治疗难治性大出血患者和同期进行子宫动脉结扎术的34例患者纳入到本次对比实验中，两组分别在本次研究中命名为观察组和对照组，对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果 经对比发现，观察组患者的治疗效果以及并发症发生几率显著优于对照组，两组之间治疗效果具有较大差异，符合统计学意义的评判标准（P＜0.05）。结论 于难治性妇产科大出血患者治疗期间采用子宫动脉栓塞术可以有效的提升治疗效果，并降低并发症发生几率，安全性较高。

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the treatment of refractory obstetric and gynecological hemorrhage.
Methods: The study included 34 patients with uterine artery embolization in the treatment of refractory massive hemorrhage and 34 patients who underwent uterine artery ligation at the same time in this comparative experiment. The two groups were named Observation in this study. Group and control group, compare the treatment effect of the two groups of patients.
Results: After comparison, it was found that the treatment effect and the incidence of complications of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group. The treatment effect between the two groups was significantly different, which met the criteria of statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : Uterine artery embolization during the treatment of patients with refractory obstetric and gynecological hemorrhage can effectively improve the treatment effect and reduce the incidence of complications, with higher safety.