期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 2: (4) ; 31-33 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijog.20220078.

Analysis of the application value of unprotected perineal midwifery nursing in the delivery of primipara
会阴无保护助产护理在初产妇分娩中的运用价值分析

作者: 王敏 *, 李兰, 祝艳, 严秀清

川北医学院附属医院 四川南充

四川省南充卫生学校 四川南充

南充市第四人民医院 四川南充

*通讯作者: 王敏,单位:川北医学院附属医院 四川南充;

发布时间: 2022-12-28 总浏览量: 335

摘要

目的 探究初产妇行会阴无保护助产护理的临床价值。方法 随机将2021年8月至2022年8月我院92例初产妇分为实验组46例(应用会阴无保护助产)、对照组46例(应用传统助产)。对比两组会阴损伤与侧切情况、护理前后SAS评分、SDS评分、并发症发生率。结果 实验组会阴损伤与侧切情况较之于对照组有差异,P<0.05;护理前,组间焦虑评分、抑郁评分差异不存在,P>0.05;经护理,实验组SAS评分(23.34±4.28)分、SDS评分(24.51±3.57)分,P<0.05;实验组并发症发生率(6.52%,3/46)明显低于对照组(23.91%,11/46),P<0.05。结论 会阴无保护助产用于初产妇分娩中的效果确切,可尽量避免损伤会阴且并发症少,有效缓解其不良心理情绪,值得推广。

关键词: 会阴无保护;助产护理;初产妇;运用价值

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical value of unprotected perineal midwifery nursing for primiparous women.
Methods From August 2021 to August 2022, 92 primiparas in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group (46 cases with unprotected perineal midwifery) and control group (46 cases with traditional midwifery). The perineal injury and lateral resection, SAS score, SDS score before and after nursing, and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
Results The perineal injury and lateral resection in experimental group were compared with those in control group (P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no difference in anxiety score and depression score between groups, P > 0.05; After nursing, SAS score and SDS score of experimental group were (23.34±4.28) and (24.51±3.57), respectively, P < 0.05. The complication rate of the experimental group (6.52%,3/46) was significantly lower than that of the control group (23.91%,11/46), P < 0.05.
Conclusion  s The effect of unprotected perineal midwifery in primipara delivery is exact, which can avoid damage to perineum as much as possible and reduce the complications, and effectively relieve their bad psychological emotions, which is worthy of promotion.

Key words: Unprotected perineum; Midwifery care; First-time mothers; Use value

参考文献 References

[1] 张文,李志芼,杨晨,等. 无保护助产护理在促进初产妇自然分娩中的疗效及会阴疼痛VAS评分影响分析[J]. 系统医学,2021,6(15):128-131.

[2] 杜滔萍. 全程助产护理对无保护会阴接生初产妇心理状态及产后疼痛的影响[J].医学信息,2021,34(z2):77-78.

[3] 吴柳,彭香莲. 无保护助产护理与会阴保护助产护理在初产妇自然分娩中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药,2020,27(32):247-249.

[4] 柏静. 改良式低位产钳术与无保护会阴助产护理用于初产妇护理中的临床效果[J].养生保健指南,2018(4):26.

[5] 林丽萍. 心理护理联合无保护会阴助产对初产妇妊娠结局和新生儿窒息评分的影响[J]. 中国基层医药,2019,26(3):377-380.

[6] 李爱. 探讨改良式低位产钳术联合无保护会阴助产护理在初产妇分娩中的应用效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2016,16(73):252-253.

[7] 陈炼坤,陆周善,黄莹. 无保护助产护理服务对促进初产妇自然分娩、减少并发症的积极作用[J]. 健康之友,2021(9):182.

[8] 邱瑞颖, 王娜娜, 李昙. 全程心理护理结合无保护会阴接生法对初产妇分娩方式和会阴损伤情况的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文),2021,7(3):89-91.

[9] 方琼燕. 自由体位分娩配合无保护会阴助产及情绪安抚在初产妇自然分娩中的应用价值[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2021,19(25):166-167.

[10] 张爱群. 无保护助产护理在促进初产妇自然分娩中的应用效果及可行性分析[J]. 母婴世界,2020(30):179.

引用本文

王敏, 李兰, 祝艳, 严秀清, 会阴无保护助产护理在初产妇分娩中的运用价值分析[J]. 国际妇产科研究, 2022; 2: (4) : 31-33.